Paediatric supracondylar fractures: assessment and management.

Supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus are the most common fracture around the elbow in children. A thorough initial assessment must be conducted to identify any associated neurovascular injury and carefully documented. The assessment should include a vascular examination of the radial pulse, temperature, colour and capillary refill time. A neurological examination must comment on the motor and sensory function of the radial, median and ulnar nerves. X-rays allow an evaluation of the fracture location and type, and the degree of displacement. Immobilisation in plaster is the gold standard treatment for paediatric supracondylar fracture of the humerus where the degree of displacement is within acceptable parameters. Casting should be followed by orthogonal radiographs and a repeat neurovascular assessment of the limb. Oral analgesia and safety netting information should be provided on discharge, and the child reviewed in a fracture clinic within 1 week of the injury. The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children are useful for junior orthopaedic and emergency medicine clinicians to refer to when dealing with these injuries.

Acute musculoskeletal infection in children: assessment and management.

Musculoskeletal infection in children is challenging to treat, and includes septic arthritis, deep tissue infection, osteomyelitis, discitis and pyomyositis. Delays to diagnosis and management, and under-treatment can be life-threatening and result in chronic disability. The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma include critical steps in the timely diagnosis and management of acute musculoskeletal infection in children, the principles of acute clinical care and the service delivery requirements to appropriately manage this cohort of patients. Orthopaedic and paediatric services are likely to encounter cases of acute musculoskeletal infection in children and thus an awareness and thorough understanding of the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma guidelines is essential. This article reviews these guidelines and associated published evidence for the management of children with acute musculoskeletal infection.

Management of Haemarthrosis in Patients On Oral Anticoagulants.

Aims: Our aim was to investigate the management of patients who were admitted to hospital with an acute haemarthrosis whilst taking oral anticoagulants, and highlight the outcomes of different management strategies. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all orthopaedic admissions over a 42-month period (January 2015-July 2018) to the Orthopaedic Department of a London District General Hospital. All patients admitted with a spontaneous joint haemarthrosis and concomitant use of oral anticoagulants was identified. Anonymised data was placed on a secure trust database. Findings: A total of 31 patients were included. 22 patients (71%) had their anticoagulant temporarily held during admission. 9 patients (32%) had their anticoagulation reversed with 10 mg of vitamin K. 5 patients had their haemarthrosis aspirated either on admission or during their hospital stay. The overall mean length of stay in patients with a haemarthrosis was 7.0 days. The mean length of stay in patients who had their anticoagulation held was 8.6 days. In contrast, patients who continued taking their anticoagulation were found to have an average length of stay of 2.3 days. No patients suffered a thrombotic event in the 60 days following discharge. No adverse events were recorded following joint aspiration. Conclusion: There is currently no consensus on the management of haemarthrosis in patients on oral anticoagulants. Continuing the anticoagulants did not increase length of hospital stay. Further research may focus on assessing the effect of management adjuncts on patient outcomes and their cost effectiveness to aid the development of local and/or national guidelines.

Spiritual interventions for cancer pain: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

BackgroundPain is a common and debilitating cancer-related symptom. In palliative care, physical, psychological, social and spiritual factors are thought to contribute to individual experience of pain. Consequently, spiritual care interventions are advocated in the management of cancer-related pain. AIM: To systematically review the published literature concerning spiritual interventions in the management of cancer-related pain. METHODOLOGY: Seven databases (Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched for quantitative studies of pain in patients with cancer receiving spiritual care interventions, with additional reference and citation searches. Research quality and relevance was appraised using Gough's 'Weight of Evidence' framework prior to narrative synthesis. RESULTS: The search identified 12 822 articles, of which 11 were included in the synthesis. Few studies have investigated spiritual interventions in the management of cancer pain: a minority of these demonstrate statistical benefit. Some evidence suggests spiritual care may aid in coping with pain, rather than altering pain intensity. Spiritual interventions are well received by patients with cancer and do not appear to cause harm. CONCLUSION: Current evidence provides limited support for the use of spiritual care interventions in the management of cancer pain. The paucity and heterogeneity of literature points to a need for high-quality research with judgements of spiritual intervention efficacy made on an individual basis. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020190194.